Tuesday, June 23, 2009

G.T.'s Response To The Naysayers

15 comments:

  1. Anonymous23 June, 2009

    Good :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous24 June, 2009

    Get down, girl, go 'head, get down.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous24 June, 2009

    Since Howard didn't bother to define visual artists, why should the city?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous24 June, 2009

    Read the decision! Paintings prints, sculpture and photographs

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous24 June, 2009

    Anonymous said...
    Since Howard didn't bother to define visual artists, why should the city?

    Who is this?

    Check the IP and see if it's from the city.

    Ask Ed Slavin what the city IP is, they are on his site several times a day.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Free speech is Free Speech...even if it is anon.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous24 June, 2009

    I think everyone wants to know if the city is posting on here.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous24 June, 2009

    G.T. swings for the bleachers. Our constitution-writing forefathers spoke anonymously. G.T.'s most ardent critics cannot slag him for appreciating free speech!

    ReplyDelete
  9. ...go GT...go GT....go GT!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous25 June, 2009

    Many people read Ed Slavin's blogs... for the comedy and/or amazement.

    Don't confuse 'viewing' with agreement or even concern.

    Kind of like a train wreck - you have to look.

    I wonder why he doesnt allow comments?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous25 June, 2009

    "Many people read Ed Slavin's blogs... for the comedy and/or amazement."

    "Don't confuse 'viewing' with agreement or even concern."

    "Kind of like a train wreck - you have to look."

    I know what you mean. It's kind of like Mike Gold's posts on the site plazabum.com.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anonymous25 June, 2009

    Anonymous said...
    I think everyone wants to know if the city is posting on here.


    Do you think it would be ok to acknowledge the city is posting and not identify which posts?

    I'd like to know for sure if it is the city that keeps posting the same thing over and over like they are stupid about the decision or one guy supporting the bad merchants down town.

    There is a man of many IPs on these sites and the game is it to stir the pot. Is it him?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anonymous25 June, 2009

    I think you should pay more attention to what is said and less attention to who said it.

    And why are YOU posting anonymously?

    Greg - we need to check HER IP address and post it as well. (like nobody knows who it is)

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anonymous25 June, 2009

    Well if the same person is saying it over and over using different IPs then that voice means nothing.

    Question:
    Why would that poster act like they don't understand the ruling?

    Answer:
    They don't want to understand the ruling for some reason.

    I don't need t o see the IPs. This question is all I asked to be confirmed. "Do you think it would be ok to acknowledge the city is posting and not identify which posts?"

    And If Grey should say no that’s ok because he’s the boss of this place. :)

    ReplyDelete
  15. Anonymous25 June, 2009

    "Greg - we need to check HER IP address and post it as well. (like nobody knows who it is)"

    Who said to post IPs?

    Someone's trying to cause a diversion away from the original question.

    Typical

    ReplyDelete